Illinois Estate Law
←Back to Blog
Guardianship•11 min read

What Happens When a Guardianship Is Contested in Illinois?

When a family disagrees or the proposed ward objects, a guardianship turns into litigation. Here is what that means, how it unfolds in the Illinois courts, and what it costs.

By Mary Liberty, Estate Planning Attorney•

Article Summary

A guardianship becomes “contested” the moment someone formally opposes it — the respondent objects to being found disabled or to the proposed guardian, a relative files a competing petition, or a sitting guardian faces removal.

Once that opposition is on file, the matter stops being a routine court appointment and becomes litigation. That means discovery, a guardian ad litem investigating and reporting to the judge, a physician's report, and an evidentiary hearing before the court rules.

A contested guardianship starts with a $5,000 flat fee. Because the opposing party may expand the work, defined contested events can create additional expenses under the written engagement. This guide explains the process and fee structure from start to finish.

At a Glance: A Contested Guardianship

What Triggers It

An objection, a competing petition, or a removal request

What It Becomes

Discovery, a guardian ad litem, and an evidentiary hearing

How Fees Work

Starts with a $5,000 flat fee; defined events may add expense

What Makes a Guardianship “Contested”?

Most Illinois guardianships are uncontested. A family agrees that a loved one can no longer manage their own affairs, everyone supports the same person serving as guardian, and the court appoints that person after a straightforward hearing. To understand how the process works when everyone is on the same page, see our overview of how guardianship works in Illinois. A guardianship becomes contested only when someone formally opposes it in court. There are three common ways that happens.

1

The respondent objects

The respondent — the adult alleged to be disabled — has the right to oppose the petition. They may contest the underlying claim that they are disabled at all, arguing that they are perfectly capable of managing their own person and finances. Or they may accept that some help is needed but object to the specific person asking to serve as their guardian. Either objection turns the case into a contest, and the respondent is entitled to counsel to make it.

2

A competing petition is filed

Sometimes no one disputes that a guardian is needed — the fight is over who should serve. A second relative or interested party files a competing petition asking the court to appoint them instead. Now the judge is not simply deciding whether to grant a guardianship, but choosing between two or more people who each want the role, weighing their fitness, their relationship to the respondent, and the respondent's own preferences.

3

A petition to remove or replace a guardian

A guardianship can also become contested after a guardian is already serving. An interested party files a petition to remove or replace the sitting guardian — often alleging that the guardian has mismanaged the ward's affairs, neglected their care, or is acting under a conflict of interest. This kind of contest arises inside an existing guardianship rather than at the outset.

These contests can arise in either an adult or a minor case. For the differences between the two, see our guide on adult versus minor guardianship in Illinois. You can also read more about contested adult matters on our contested guardianship page.

Common Contested Guardianship Scenarios

Contested guardianships tend to follow a handful of familiar patterns. Recognizing them early helps families understand what they are walking into — and, often, whether the fight is really necessary.

Siblings disagree over who should serve

Two or more adult children each believe they are the right person to care for an aging parent. Everyone accepts that Mom or Dad needs help — but old family dynamics, geography, and mistrust turn the choice of guardian into a court battle. This is one of the most common contests we see.

An adult child versus a new spouse

When a parent has remarried, an adult child and a stepparent may each seek control over the parent's care and finances. Suspicion runs in both directions — the child worries the new spouse is protecting their own interests, the spouse feels shut out — and the court is asked to sort out who should serve.

The respondent contests capacity

The person alleged to be disabled disagrees. They insist they can still handle their own affairs and oppose being placed under any guardianship at all. Because Illinois law protects an adult's autonomy, the respondent is entitled to counsel and to require the petitioner to prove the case.

Allegations a guardian is self-dealing or neglecting duties

Inside an existing guardianship, a family member alleges that the guardian is helping themselves to the ward's money, failing to account for spending, or neglecting the ward's medical and personal needs. These allegations open a contest over whether the guardian should be removed and held responsible.

How a Contested Guardianship Unfolds

Once an objection or competing petition is on file, the case moves onto a litigation track. The steps below do not always happen in a strict order, and not every case involves every step — but this is the shape of a contested guardianship in Illinois.

1

Petition and objection

The process begins with a petition to appoint a guardian, filed in the Circuit Court of the county where the respondent lives — in Chicago and the suburbs, the Cook County Probate Division. The contest is formalized when the respondent objects, or when an interested party files a competing petition or a written objection. From that point the court treats the matter as adversarial.

2

The guardian ad litem's investigation and report

The court appoints a guardian ad litem (GAL) — usually an attorney — to serve as the court's eyes and ears. The GAL meets with the respondent, explains their rights, reviews records, speaks with the parties, and files a written report and recommendation to the judge about whether a guardian is needed and who should serve. The GAL's report carries real weight in a contested case.

3

Discovery

Because the case is now litigation, the parties exchange information through discovery — requests for documents such as medical and financial records, written interrogatories, and depositions of witnesses. Discovery is often where a contested guardianship gains the most time and expense, because each side is entitled to develop its evidence.

4

The physician's report and possible independent evaluation

Illinois requires a report from a physician who has examined the respondent, describing the nature and extent of any disability. In a contested case, a party may challenge that report or ask the court to order an independent medical or psychological evaluation, so the judge hears more than one clinical opinion about the respondent's capacity.

5

The evidentiary hearing

If the parties do not resolve the matter, the judge holds an evidentiary hearing. Each side presents witnesses and documents, cross-examines the other side's witnesses, and the respondent has the right to be present, to be represented, and in appropriate cases to request a jury. The GAL's report and the physician's findings are part of the record the judge weighs.

6

The judge's ruling

After the hearing, the court decides whether the respondent is a disabled person, whether a guardian is warranted, how much authority that guardian should have, and who should serve. The judge is guided by the standard of proof and the least-restrictive-alternative preference discussed below, and enters an order that sets the terms of the guardianship going forward.

Roles matter in a contest

Part of what the court decides is whether one person will handle both personal and financial decisions, or whether those roles should be split. For how those two jobs differ — and why the distinction can shape a contest — see our guide on the guardian of the person versus guardian of the estate.

The Standard of Proof

Illinois does not let a court take away an adult's decision-making authority lightly. To appoint a guardian for an adult, the petitioner must prove that the person is a “disabled person” by clear and convincing evidence — the standard set out in 755 ILCS 5/11a-3. That is a demanding burden: higher than the “preponderance of the evidence” used in ordinary civil disputes, though not the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of a criminal trial. In a contested case, meeting it usually requires a credible physician's report together with testimony and other evidence that the adult truly cannot manage their person or estate.

The least-restrictive-alternative preference

Even when disability is proven, 755 ILCS 5/11a-12 directs the court to impose only as much guardianship as the person actually needs. A judge may order a “limited” guardianship covering only specific areas rather than a “plenary” (full) guardianship over every decision. In a contest, this preference often matters as much as the disability finding itself — the fight may be less about whether the person needs help and more about how much authority a guardian should hold.

For minors, the analysis is different — the court focuses on the child's best interests and the parents' circumstances rather than proving disability. Our guide on adult versus minor guardianship explains those distinctions, and our adult guardianship page covers the adult process in more detail.

Removing or Replacing a Guardian

Some of the most difficult contests arise after a guardian is already in place. If an interested party believes the guardian is not doing the job properly, they can petition the court to remove and replace them. Illinois courts have clear authority to do so when the guardian has failed to live up to the fiduciary duties of the role.

•Failing to file the required inventory or annual accountings with the court
•Self-dealing — using the ward's assets for the guardian's own benefit
•Neglecting the ward's medical, personal, or day-to-day care needs
•Serving under a conflict of interest that works against the ward

When the allegation involves money, a removal petition is often paired with a claim for a surcharge or breach of fiduciary duty — asking the court not only to remove the guardian but to order them to repay the estate for losses caused by their misconduct. The court can then appoint a successor guardian to take over the ward's care and finances.

A familiar pattern in probate

Removing a guardian for self-dealing or failure to account closely mirrors the disputes that arise when an executor or administrator mishandles a decedent's estate. If you are dealing with the parallel situation after a death, our contested probate page explains how the court handles a fiduciary who has breached their duties.

How Fees Work in a Contested Guardianship

Contested guardianship begins with a $5,000 flat fee covering a defined initial scope. Because the opposing party may create additional work through motions, discovery, hearings, or trial preparation, the written engagement identifies events that may create additional expenses. Those expenses are conditional rather than automatically required.

Third-party costs remain separate from the firm's fee. The largest is often the guardian ad litem's fee, which the court sets and allocates among the parties, but costs can also include filing fees, deposition transcripts, and an independent evaluation. The firm explains the applicable scope and possible event-based expenses before work begins.

Facing a Contested Guardianship?

Illinois Estate Law helps Chicago-area families navigate contested guardianships — from objections and competing petitions to removal and surcharge claims. We explain the initial flat-fee scope and any conditional event-based expenses before you commit.

You can read more about how we structure fees for contested adult matters on our contested guardianship page. The important takeaway is that the initial flat fee covers a defined scope, while specified litigation events may create additional expenses under the written agreement.

When a Flat-Fee Guardianship Becomes Contested

A common and understandable worry: “I hired you for a flat-fee guardianship — what happens to my money if it turns into a fight?” This comes up most often with matters that start out uncontested, such as a minor guardianship everyone expected to be routine. Here is exactly how we handle it, and why you do not need to worry about losing what you have already paid.

If a matter accepted as uncontested later becomes contested, the firm provides a separate contested flat-fee scope. It explains in writing how the amount already paid applies before contested representation begins. Defined contested events may create additional expenses under the engagement agreement, but those expenses are not automatically required.

The scope is explained in writing

Before contested representation begins, the firm explains how the amount already paid applies, what the initial contested flat fee covers, and which defined events could create additional expenses.

None of this is a surprise, either. We explain the conversion up front and write it directly into the engagement agreement, so you know before you ever sign exactly how a flat fee will be treated if the matter becomes contested. The goal is simple: to make sure a change in the nature of your case never becomes a change you did not see coming.

How to Reduce the Risk of a Contested Guardianship

The most reliable way to avoid a contested guardianship is to make guardianship unnecessary in the first place. When you plan ahead, you make the decisions yourself — while you still have capacity — instead of leaving them to a courtroom and to relatives who may not agree.

Without Advance Planning

  • ✗A court, not you, decides who manages your affairs
  • ✗Relatives can fight over who should serve
  • ✗The process becomes public litigation
  • ✗Discovery, a GAL, and a hearing all take time
  • ✗Defined litigation events may create additional expenses
  • ✗Family relationships are strained for years

With Durable Powers of Attorney

  • ✓You choose your own agents while you have capacity
  • ✓Usually no guardianship — so nothing to contest
  • ✓Private documents, not a public court record
  • ✓Agents can act immediately, without a court wait
  • ✓Named successor agents avoid gaps in authority
  • ✓Clear documentation reduces family conflict

Put durable powers of attorney in place

A durable power of attorney for property and a power of attorney for health care let you name the people you trust to manage your finances and medical decisions — no court required. Because you chose them yourself, there is nothing for relatives to litigate. This is the single most effective step to keep these decisions out of a contested proceeding.

Learn about our powers of attorney services

Keep clear, current documentation

Name successor agents in case your first choice cannot serve, review your documents every few years, and make sure your agents know where the originals are kept. Clear, up-to-date paperwork leaves far less room for disagreement — and far less opening for a family fight if capacity ever comes into question.

Compare guardianship and power of attorney

Frequently Asked Questions

Next Steps

If you are facing a contested guardianship — whether you are seeking to serve, objecting to someone else's petition, or asking the court to remove a guardian who is not doing the job — the right guidance early can make a significant difference in how the matter unfolds and what it costs.

And if no one is incapacitated yet, the best step of all is to plan ahead. A durable power of attorney set up now usually avoids guardianship entirely, sparing your family the time, expense, and strain of a court fight later. To learn more about the process and how we can help, visit our guardianship page or book a free consultation.

Speak With an Illinois Guardianship Attorney

Illinois Estate Law helps Chicago-area families through contested guardianships and the advance planning that can prevent them — durable powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and complete estate plans. We explain the fee structure clearly so you always know how you will be billed.

Call (312) 373-0731 to speak directly with our team.

Mary Liberty - Chicago Estate Planning Attorney

Mary Liberty — Chicago Estate Planning Attorney

Mary Liberty is a Chicago-based estate planning and probate attorney dedicated to making legal planning accessible, affordable, and stress-free. Through her modern virtual law practice, she helps families and individuals across Illinois create clear, effective plans that protect their assets and their loved ones.

Mary focuses on estate planning, uncontested probate, and her signature partial probate service. Known for her precision, empathy, and plain-language guidance, she operates on a 100% flat-fee model so clients always know exactly what to expect.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this content. Illinois guardianship law is complex and fact-specific — procedures and requirements vary by county and individual circumstances. Consult a licensed Illinois attorney for guidance tailored to your situation.

Facing a Contested Guardianship — or Want to Avoid One?

Book a free consultation with Illinois Estate Law. Whether you are in a court fight now or want to plan ahead so your family never has one, we can help you understand your options and your costs.

SHARE THIS POST:

Send Us a Message

Your consultation is with the actual lawyer who will handle your case